Tuesday, March 29, 2011

FEC:Why is Facebook unregulated since gift Dems?

This is my open letter to the Federal Election Campaign Office [FEC] that supposedly regulates federal elections to keep them honest:

In the New York Times courtesy of Google, I read this am how Facebook is planning to hire Robin Gibbs, who is intimately familiar with the current administration that is planning to mount a reelection campaign, as what a lobbyist or a spy for Dems, who knows? And the same article told of the close to Clintons employee of Facebook, and the close to- US- Supreme-Court employee of Facebook. It is very apparent to citizens who don't work for the federal government that the Democratic Party controls Facebook and gets many gift in kind perqs from them such as the info and data of Facebook users to contact privately for FREE. So why is the FEC looking the other way on this ethics problem of Facebook underwriting the Democratic Party? Why is the FEC NOT regulating/monitoring the many perqs the current President, the current Secretary of State who is planning to run for President, and the current Democrats in office? WHY is Facebook being allowed to donate time.their users' info, their platform, their staff, their CEO to the Democratic Party without being held to the standards of contributors to federal elections?
I smell a skunk in Facebook's cozy relationship with federal democrats; and I expect the FEC to begin hauling in their records and monitoring Facebook and Democrats including Obama who are utilizing its services as campaign HQ online.
Either monitor- regulate the dems on the issues of fair,honest elections or don't regulate the Republicans. It is not the purpose of the FEC to suppress the Republican Party, while giving wink-wink free reins to the Democrats. Gloria Poole,RN ;@my apt in Missouri;11:23am;29/March/2011

Friday, March 18, 2011

NO to Embryonic Killing for any reason

There is an article in Medical News today touting stem cells being injected into human hearts damaged by heart attacks. But do not be deceived just because it has the word 'medical' in it. Remember it was medical doctors who ordered the gassing of the Jews in Nazi Germany. NO ONE will profit long term by ingesting/cannabalizing/having injected living humans! Because GOD is not mocked according to Galatians 6:7 as written, 'be not deceived. GOD is not mocked. For whatsoever a man soweth,that shall he also reap." If a person compels medical doctors to kill a tiny thumb-size human to save himself or herself, the consequences of that will be their own death as promised by GOD. Also as promised by GOD in Exodus 9:6 as written, 'whoso sheddeth man's blood, by man shall his blood be shed; for in the image of GOD, made HE man." {King James Holy Bible].
Medical Doctors are not licensed for the purpose of killing; at least not by GOOD states. If you have a doctor who recommends killing of embryoes to you in any fashion,form or procedure, get yourself up, sign yourself out without medical advice and find a GOOD doctor. IF a doctor would suggest killing the tiniest most defenseless humans for profit, he or she would have no qualms about killing you either.
Gloria Poole,RN; 8:58am;18 March 2011;@ home in Missouri

Saturday, March 5, 2011

US does not need or want King Obama from Africa

"Under current law, federal dollars may not be used for abortions except in the cases of rape, incest or when the life of the mother is in danger."
But Obama in violation of the public law on this subject wrote an executive order to redirect money intended for citizens in the US for real health care [not defined as killing of innocents-in-womb] to be sent overseas to kill innocents-in-womb-abroad-- to kill off those put on list to be destroyed by federal shadow government of Planned Unparenthood.
I don't know about the rest of this country but I read and comprehend English very well. There is NO AUTHORITY in the US Constitution for Obama to 'undo " laws passed by both Houses of Congress by written decree. That is a usurpation of power that is unconstitutional and the Congress should start impeachment of him for it. When neither the Congress nor the President know the actual words of the Constitution, this nation is in deep trouble! Or if they know them but refuse to abide by, follow,obey them. We as a nation do not need nor want King Obama from Kenya as President. Impeach that immoral pervert for trying to rewrite the US Constitution and appoint himself King.
Gloria Poole,RN; @my apt in Misouri; 5-March-2011;12:19pm [noonish]
Update after reading New York Times, to add this info that shows the Republicans * are gearing up to take down King Obama and thank GOD:This quote from NY Times article entitled "House Republicans Move to uphold Marriage Act " [a public law] today :
"Speaker John A. Boehner of Ohio took to the political tightrope with an arabesque on Friday, when he announced in a news release that he would convene the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group, made up of the three top Republicans and two most senior Democrats in the House, “for the purpose of initiating action by the House to defend this law of the United States.”
Remember that neither Obama nor any other President has lawful authority to rewrite the US Constitution OR CREATE law. Obama went to Harvard supposedly; where they teach nincompoop nonsense based on feel good voodoo economics and totalitarian governments . He probably never actually read the Constitution but bought Cliff Notes about it or an essay on line that put in the fake versions touted everywhere with words not included anywhere in the U S Constitution or Bill of Rights [Amendments to the Constitution, which require passage by both houses of Congress and ratification by the people themselves in referendum sort of vote in which 2/3 of states agree to amend it. Obama has no authority to amend the Marriage Act or any public law created/voted on by both houses of Congress affirmatively to create a new law or modify a public law in the Federal Code. And he certainly as NO AUTHORITY to create or write new law. That is in the realm of Kings of the sort of Libya, that is not acceptable in the US! NOT NOW NOT EVER!!!
*Footnote; by definition the word republican means a form of government that has a written Constitution voted on by the people and agreed too by the people themseves, with the rules written down so the people know them. When any President starts creating law, the nation has shifted from republican form of government to a monarchy. It also creates government by whim of despot and the rules shift day by day so the ONLY possible result of such is anarchy--lawlessness when no one knows what the rules are, or realize that they are arbitrarily enforced depending on the politics of the Monarch/leader/President.

Friday, March 4, 2011

Good News: FBI arrested person making death threats

This is from Feb 25th sent to me via email.
Article at:
article by Steven Ertelt of Life News with this news: [quoting]
"The Federal Bureau of Investigation yesterday arrested abortion supporter Theodore Shulman, 49, and charged him with communicating interstate threats against two pro-life advocates. Shulman is currently being held without bond at Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York City, which is a federal holding facility.
Operation Rescue officials, who have been on the receiving end of Shulman’s threats, were informed about the information in the complaint against him before it went under seal. The two people Shulman threatened  are simply referred to as Victim 1 and Victim 2 and the pro-life group told it is withholding the identities  in order to protect their safety."
This is good news to me. I know for certain that Shulman man is not the only making threats to kill prolifers but it's a start in the right direction for the FBI. Prayer is working. Keep praying prolifers!
And of course, you know I am a PROLIFER and a Registered Nurse licensed in Missouri. And I am always prolife when you are discussing innocent lives. But I believe very much in punishing those who kill innocents according to scripture.
The fact that FBI is beginning to value the lives of prolifers is good news indeed.Gloria Poole,RN;@my apt in Misouri; 4-March-2011;10:02am
Update @10:24 on topic of law enforcement upholding the real laws, and because it shows the lack of caliber of Supreme Court, which is the linchpin of the evil of abortion :
"As Glenn Greenwald explains in his forthcoming book With Liberty and Justice for Some, despite living in a country with an unusually harsh criminal code that has created by far the biggest prison population in the world, our political and financial elites operate with something approaching complete impunity, safe in the knowledge that demands they be subjected to the same laws as everybody else will be ignored.
This in turn helps explain why a Supreme Court justice's egregious flouting of the law doesn't rise to the level of a significant public scandal: Because nothing is going to happen to [ Supreme Court "Justice" Clarence]Thomas, the fact that he has spent the last several years repeatedly flipping off the very same legal system that has made him one of the most powerful people in the country doesn't qualify as significant news. In America today, after all, the president orders American citizens to be assassinated with no trial, investment bankers steal billions, prisoners are tortured in flagrant violation of both U.S. and international law, and the legal system simply looks the other way. In such an atmosphere, it stands to reason that a Supreme Court justice committing a few minor crimes is a dog-bites-man story."
Quotes from article at: written by Paul Campos law Professor at Univ of Colorado. [Aside: I cannot say that the state of Colorado applies any law fairly as they put no value whatsoever on my life when I lived in Colorado and they allowed my then-husband [now second ex-husband] who admitted to being a cocaine-addict to hurt me seriously several times because they did not want to prosecute him because he gave intimate massages to men in high places. So I am hesitant to quote Paul Campos on anything. But Clarence Thomas is not above the law simply because he's the 'token black' on Spreme Court. And I put token black precisely because the news reported he has not opened his mouth at the Supreme Court bench in five years' time.]